High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 02 MP CK 0088

Mahesh @ Halke S/O Laluram @ Lalu Pal vs State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 11 February 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 1525 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

27 paragraphs · 488 words

Rajeev Kumar Shrivastava, J

Present criminal appeal filed u/S.14(A)(2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, assails the order dated

04.12.2021 passed by the Special Judge (Atrocities), Datia (M.P.); whereby, the application preferred by appellant herein u/S.439 of Cr.P.C. has been

rejected.

Appellant has been arrested on 03/07/2021 in connection with offences punishable u/S. 363, 365 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and added Sections 11/13 of MPDVPK Act, Section 25(1) (a), 30 of Arms Act and

Sections 39/192(1), 146, 196, 3/181 of Motor Vehicles Act, registered as Crime No.115/2021 by Police Station Pandokhar, District Datia (M.P.).

Learned counsel for the appellant- Mahesh @ Halke has submitted that the appellant has not committed any offence. He has falsely been implicated

in this case. Appellant is in custody since 03/07/2021. Co-accused has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 28.01.2022 passed in

Cr.A. No.7936/2021. Trial will take its own time. The appellant is ready to abide by any condition which may be imposed by this Court. Hence,

considering the aforesaid facts, learned counsel prays for grant of bail to the appellant.

Learned State counsel has vehemently opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant and prayed for dismissal of this criminal

appeal.

Heard learned counsel for the parties through VC and perused the case diary. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the

appellant along with fact that appellant is in custody since 03/07/2021 and trial will take its own time, without commenting on merits of the case, the

appeal is allowed. It is hereby directed that the appellant shall be released on bail on her furnishing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lac

Only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the appellant:-

1.

The appellant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

2.

The appellant will co-operate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3.

The appellant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to

dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4.

The appellant shall not commit any kind of offence. In case of commission of any kind of offence, this bail order shall automatically stand canceled;

5.

The appellant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6.

The appellant will not leave India without previous permission of trial Court/ Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

This criminal appeal stands disposed of in above terms.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the Court concerned for information. Certified copy as per rules