High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 08 UK CK 0201

Mahesh Chandra Singh & Another vs Dilip Kumar & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 12 August 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 333 Of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

23 paragraphs · 433 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

Petitioners’ father Aan Singh filed Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2552 of 2007, claiming Freedom Fighter Pension, as per the Scheme framed by the

Centre as well as the State Government. During pendency of the said writ petition, Aan Singh passed away; therefore, petitioners were substituted in

his place as his legal representatives. The said writ petition was allowed by Writ Court, vide order dated 01.05.2014.

2.

Alleging wilful disobedience of the said order, this Contempt Petition was filed in the year 2015.

3.

A response affidavit has been filed on behalf of Mr. Pankaj Tiwari, Director, Treasury, Pension & Entitlement, Uttarakhand, Dehradun. Para no.

12 of the said compliance affidavit is reproduced below:-

“12. That thus it is submitted that the payment of arrears of State Freedom Fighter Pension, as directed by the Hon’ble Court vide judgment

and order dated 01-05-2014 to the legal heirs of late Aan Singh, can be made after receiving the duly sanctioned orders from the department of Home,

Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun. Thus, the compliance of the judgment and order dated 01-05-2014 is not pending at the level of the answering

respondent. The compliance of the judgment and order dated 01-05-2014 is pending at the level of Government Department of Home, Uttarakhand,

Dehradun.â€​

4.

Thus, the defence taken by Director, Treasury, Pension & Entitlement, Uttarakhand is that in the absence of any sanction order by Home

Department of the State Government, arrears of Freedom Fighter Pension cannot be granted. In para no. 10 of the said affidavit, it has been further

stated that the Directorate of Pension has written a letter on 09.04.2021 to Secretary, Home Department with a request to take appropriate action as

per the judgment rendered by Writ Court.

5.

From the response affidavit filed by respondent no. 2, it is apparent that the Home Department of State Government has to take decision in the

matter and without any favourable order from Home Department, Freedom Fighter Pension cannot be released to the petitioner.

6.

Since Secretary, Home Department, Government of Uttarakhand is not before this Court, therefore, the present Contempt Petition is disposed of

with liberty to petitioner to approach the Secretary, Home Department, by making a representation. The Secretary concerned shall consider case of

the petitioner for grant of arrears of Freedom Fighter Pension to the petitioner in the light of judgment rendered by Writ Court on 01.05.2014 and pass

appropriate order as per law, within ten weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Contempt notice issued against respondent

no. 1 is hereby discharged.