High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 01 DEL CK 0350

Mahendra Nathani vs National Capital Territory Of Delhi And Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 15 January 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Gita Mittal, J · C.Hari Shankar , J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No. 9452 Of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

34 paragraphs · 429 words

Gita Mittal, J

1.

This writ petition complains of the discrepancy in the issuance of Excise Policy issued by the Government of NCT of Delhi under Rule 21 of the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010 on annual basis.

2.

The petitioner has stated that post the year 2000, the Excise Policy duly notified as late as in July, August and September of the concerned financial year is to the prejudice of the persons affected thereby.

3.

Pursuant to the directions made by us calling upon the respondents to disclose on tabulation the dates on which the Excise Policy was notified in the last five years, a status report dated 10th January, 2018 has been filed which makes the following disclosure:

"Sr. No.

Excise year

Date of implementation

1.

2012-13

01.05.2012

2.

2013-14

01.06.2013

3.

2014-15

01.07.2014

4.

2015-16

01.08.2015

5.

2016-17

16.10.2016"

There is therefore, substance in the submissions made by Mr. Shailen Bhatia, ld. counsel for the petitioner regarding delay in the issuance of the policy.

4.

For expediency, we may usefully extract Rule 21 of the Delhi Excise Rules, 2010:-

"21. Period for which licence may be granted. -

Unless the Government otherwise directs, licence shall ordinarily be granted for a period of one year.

Temporary licence may be given to provide for the sale of liquor on special occasions in such cases and on such occasions, as the Deputy Commissioner may determine.

All licences other than temporary licences shall, unless otherwise provided, determine on 31st March, next following the grant or renewal."

5.

It is evident from the bare reading of Rule 21 that it envisages a policy/licence for a duration of one year. Even the fee so announced thereunder is on the yearly basis.

6.

Though the legislature has empowered the respondents to extend the duration of the licence which expires on 31st March, against receipt of payment, however this extension cannot be made as routine procedure and has to be treated as an emergency provision.

7.

It would therefore, appear that the respondents are bound to abide by the discipline recognized by the Rules.

8.

In view of the above, it is directed that the respondents would take steps so as to ensure that the Excise Police is notified expeditiously before the 31st March of each calendar year.

9.

Efforts shall be made to ensure that this discipline is followed and the extension, if at all is warranted, shall only be in exceptional circumstances and not ordinarily or as a routine.

10.

This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms Dasti to parties.