High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 04 RAJ CK 0100

Mahendra Kumar Yadav S/o Satyveer Yadav vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 21 April 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Dinesh Mehta
CASE NUMBER
1874 of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 246 words
1.

Counsel for the parties jointly submit that this writ petition is

squarely covered by the order dated 19.05.2016 passed in S.B.

Civil Writ Petition No.8988/2014 (Anand Purohit & Ors. Vs.

State & Ors.), appeal against which has also been dismissed by

the Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.03.2017 in

D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.854/2016 [State & Ors. Vs.

Madhusudan Vyas & Ors. along with other connected

matters).

2.

In view of the above, the present Writ Petition is allowed in

terms of the order dated 19.05.2016 passed in S.B. Civil Writ

Petition No.8988/2014 (Anand Purohit & Ors. Vs. State & Ors.

and other connected cases). The operative portion of the said

judgment is reproduced as under and the same shall apply to the

petitioners (herein) also.

"Resultantly, the writ petitions are allowed with a

direction to consider the claim of the petitioners for

increments as per Clause 15 of the agreements and to

revise the remuneration of the petitioners has been

done vide order dated 10.12.2010 so as to bring them

in parity with other contractual employees. The needful

shall be done within a period of three months from

receipt of certified copy of this order. After the

remuneration is re-fixed and increments, if any, are

due, the arrears be released within a period of three

months thereafter, failing which the amounts payable

will carry an interest of 6% from the date due till date

of disbursement."

No order as to costs.