Tribunals and Commissions(2008) 01 NCDRC CK 0010

MAHAMOOD ALAM vs B S E S POWER RAJDHANI LTD

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 28 January 2008 · Citation: 2008 4 CPJ 368

HON’BLE JUDGES
J.D.Kapoor , Rumnita Mittal J.

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 182 words
1.

VIDE impugned order dated 6. 12. 2007, the District Forum, declined to give interim relief to the appellant for restraining the respondent from disconnecting the electricity on the premise that the allegations make prima facie a case of theft of electricity.

2.

IN our view such a conclusion could not have been drawn by the District Forum at the stage of admission of the complaint without calling for the reply of the respondent against the allegations of the appellant. In the result the appeal is allowed at the outset, impugned order is set aside and the matter is sent back to the District Forum with the direction to decide the interim application after calling reply of the respondent on the application as well as on merit of the complaint.

The appellant shall appear before District Forum on 28. 2. 2008 for the aforesaid purpose.

3.

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and also to the concerned District Forum and thereafter the file be consigned to Record Room. Appeal allowed.