Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 05 ITAT CK 3325

Mahagun (India) Pvt. Ltd. vs ACIT, CC-13

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi · Decided on 22 May 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Rifaur Rahman, Accountant Member · Anubhav Sharma, Judicial Member
CASE NUMBER
ITA No.75/Del/2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 182 words

PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:

This appeal is preferred by the assessee against the order dated 16.08.2025 of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-26 Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the First Appellate Authority or ‘the ld. FAA’ for short) DIN & Order No: ITBA/APL/S/250/2025-26/1079660369(1) arising out of the assessment order dated 19.03.2025 u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) passed by DCIT, Central Circle - 13, Delhi for AY: 2013-14.

2.

On hearing both sides we find that the issue involved is the levy of penalty on account of addition made on deemed rental income and ld. Counsel has relied the decision of Hon’ble Delhi High Court in the case of PCIT Vs. Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Ltd, reported as (2023) 152 taxmann.com 49/(2024) 460 ITR 341 (Delhi HC) wherein Hon’ble High Court has held that the issue involved was debatable at that point in time, thus, levy of penalty was deleted. The proposition of law squarely applies to the facts of case of assessee, accordingly, we allow the appeal and penalty levied is deleted.