Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2009) 04 SC CK 0125

Mahabir Prasad Jalan and Another vs Satish Deora

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 13 April 2009 · Citation: (2009) 3 AWC 2579 Supp : (2009) 6 SCALE 646 : (2009) 11 SCC 555

HON’BLE JUDGES
Tarun Chatterjee, J · H. L. Dattu, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 2381 of 2009 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 8329 of 2008) and Civil Appeal No. 2382 of 2009 (Arising out of SLP (C) No. 19209 of 2008)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 296 words
1.

Leave granted in both these special leave petitions.

2.

Appellant's application filed before the trial court in T.S. No. 23 of 2001, for issuance of a direction to the defendant therein, is rejected by the trial court and the same is confirmed by the High Court by dismissing the Revisional Application C.O. No. 3410 of 2007 dated 1.10.2007.

3.

The appellant by filing application u/s 151 of C.P.C. in T.S. No. 23 of 2001, had sought for a direction to the defendant in the Civil Suit to pay rent/compensation at the enhanced rate.

4.

At the time of hearing of this appeal, Shri S.N. Mukherjee, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent herein, on instructions; very fairly submits that the respondent herein would pay an amount of Rs. 31,656.04 and Rs. 38, 961.08 in both these appeals, respectively, commencing from 5th of April, 2009, subject to the result of the Civil Suit pending before the trial court between the parties.

5.

Shri Vijay Hansaria, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant, has no objection to the suggestion made by learned Senior Counsel for the respondent.

6.

In view of the above, it may not be necessary for us to go into the issues raised by the parties in this appeal. Accordingly, we dispose of the appeals, by directing the respondent herein to pay an amount of Rs. 31,656.04 and Rs. 38, 961.08 by way of rent/compensation for the two premises in their occupation during the pendency of the Civil Suit commencing from 5th of April, 2009, and also subject to the result of the suit/s. Appeals are disposed of.

7.

We place on record our deep appreciation to the efforts made by the learned Senior Counsel Shri S.N. Mukherjee in amicably settling the matter.