High CourtsDivision Bench(1910) 02 BOM CK 0013

Maganlal Mulji vs Bhogilal Naranji

Bombay High Court · Decided on 15 February 1910 · Citation: (1910) 12 BOMLR 365

HON’BLE JUDGES
N.G. Chandavarkar, J · Knight, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Extraordinary Application No. 244 of 1909

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 90 words

N.G. Chandavarkar, J.—The decision'' of the Subordinate Judge having been u/s 295 of the old Civil Procedure Code, no appeal lay. see Kashiratn v. Mani Ram ILR(1892) All, 120, Jagadish Chandra Shah v. Kripa Nath Shah ILR (1889) Cal. 48. Therefore the lower appellate Court had no jurisdiction to deal with the appeal. But it appears that the question of jurisdiction was not raised before it. Therefore we make the rule absolute with costs of this application, but not with the costs of the appeal in the lower appellate Court.