High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 07 UK CK 0037

Madhu Thakur vs State Of Uttarakhand

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 2 July 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ravindra Maithani, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
First Bail Application No. 1249 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 208 words

Ravindra Maithani, J

1.

Applicant is in judicial custody in FIR No.98 of 2024, under Sections 8/20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Police Station ITI, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar. She has sought her release on bail.

2.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3.

According to the FIR, on 18.03.2024, narcotic substances were recovered from the possession of the applicant.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the alleged recovered quantity is less than commercial, which is evident from the bail rejection order; the applicant has no criminal history; the prosecution story is much doubtful; the applicant, being woman, is entitled to bail.

5.

Learned State Counsel admits that the alleged recovered quantity is less than commercial. She would submit that the bail rejection order does not reveal any previous conviction of the applicant.

6.

Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.

7.

The bail application is allowed.

8.

Let the applicant be released on bail, on her executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.