High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 09 RAJ CK 0142

Madhu Chauhan @APPELLANT@Hash State of Rajasthan & Ors

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 26 September 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Alok Sharma, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Writ Petition No.21581 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

31 paragraphs · 603 words

This petition has been filed praying for appropriate order or direction for the petitioner being admitted to MBBS Course, 2018 against the vacant seat

at the Dr.S.N. Medical College, Jodhpur following the resignation of one Ms.Armaandeep Kaur Virk therefrom on 1.9.2018.

For the record this petition was filed on 19.9.2018.

The petitioner having obtained merit No.2696 in the State Medical List at the NEET UG Examination 2018, registered for counselling and sought

admission to MBBS course in a Medical College in the State of Rajasthan. She was admittedly considered both in the first and second round of

counselling, but could not be allotted a seat in view of not being found meritorious vis-a-vis other competing applicants. The petitioner also did not find

place for allotment of a Medical College in the mop up round of counselling held on 31.08.2018 and thus remained without admission to any Medical

College in the State of Rajasthan.

The petitioner appears to have got a wind on the vacant seat following Ms.Armaandeep Kaur Virk’s resignation from her seat from Dr.S.N.

Medical College Jodhpur and has therefor filed this petition seeking directions for being considered for admission to the said vacant seat.

Reply to the writ petition has been filed by the respondentâ€"NEET UG Medical Board, 2018. Appearing for it Mr.S.K. Gupta, AAG submitted that

this petition is without any legal foundation and misdirected inasmuch as in terms of the schedule in the Graduate Medical Education, Regulations,

1997 (hereafter ‘Regulations of 1997’) as amended on 6.2.2018 the last date for admission/ joining in the MBBS Course for Academic Year

2018-19 and onwards both on the Central and State quota seats is 31.8.2018. Mr.S.K. Gupta, submitted that subsequently by an amendment to the

Regulations of 1997 notified on 18.5.2018, it has been categorically provided that “in any circumstances, last date for admission/ joining will not

be extended after 31st  August, 2018 of the given Academic Year.†In this aforesaid scheme of the statutorily Regulations of 1997, Mr.S.K.Gupta,

AAG appearing for the respondentâ€"NEET PG Medical and Dental Admission/ Counselling Board, 2018 and Mr.Angad Mirdha, for respondentâ€

MCI have submitted that the petitioner cannot seek a direction from this Court on 26th September, 2018 for admission in breach of the prohibition in

regard thereto in the Regulations of 1997.

They submitted that the equitable jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India does not extend to a direction contrary to the

law.

Mr.Rajendra Soni counsel for the petitioner sought to rely upon the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Priya Gupta vs. State of Chhatisgarh

[(2012)7 SCC 433] to contend that the last date for admission to MBBS Course is 30.9.2018 even for the Academic Year 2018-19.

I am afraid that the argument of Mr.Rajendra Soni is quite misplaced and reliance placed on the aforesaid judgment is quite desperate and obviously of

no avail as the said judgment relates to admission to MBBS Course for the Academic Year 201112 which were governed by the then extant

Regulations. For the purpose of evaluation of the case of the petitioner as agitated in this petition, reference to Regulations of 1997, as presently obtain

is necessary. And as recorded above, in terms thereof, a categorical prohibition obtains on admissions to the MBBS Course for the Academic Year

2018-19 and onwards subsequent to 31.8.2018.

The petitioner in the circumstances has not been able to make out any case for this Court to exercise its extraordinary equitable jurisdiction and issue

the direction sought as no legal or fundamental right of the petitioner has been contravened.

The petition is dismissed.