AI Structured Summary
Not yet generated for this judgment
Judgment
By the Court
We have read the judgment of the High Court that is under appeal and it does appear to us that the High Court has proceeded upon a factual basis that is not indicated anywhere in the other of the Tribunal, which is the final fact-finding authority. The learned Solicitor General, appearing on behalf of the revenue, fairly, does not dispute this position. In his submission, however, the order of the Tribunal is erroneous by reason of the decision of this court in Bharat Hari Singhania and others Vs. Commissioner of Wealth Tax (Central) and others, . This is not a case that was argued before the High Court and is not a case which was known to the assessee.
We think, therefore, in the circumstances that it is appropriate to allow the appeals, set aside the order under appeal and restore the reference (Matter No. 2858 (sic-2658) of 1991) to the file of the High Court at Calcutta to be heard and disposed of afresh. It is made clear that it shall be open to both parties to raise appropriate contentions.
Order on the appeals accordingly.
No order as to costs.