High CourtsDivision Bench(1940) 09 MAD CK 0051

Machinari Lakshmi Amma vs Thundikandiyil Parkum Natukandiyil Koyithatta Krishnakurup

Madras High Court · Decided on 26 September 1940 · Citation: AIR 1941 Mad 940(2) : (1941) 54 LW 387 : (1941) 2 MLJ 254

HON’BLE JUDGES
Lakshmana Rao, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 110 words

Lakshmana Rao, J.—The marriage was not disputed and the evidence does not warrant the conclusion that it was dissolved before the Madras Marumakkathayam Act of 1932 came into force. The marriage has therefore to be deemed to be a legal marriage and on the finding of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate that the income of the tavazhi properties of the petitioner is very little, the infant son is also entitled to maintenance. The order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate is therefore set aside and the petition is remanded to him for fixing the appropriate rate of maintenance for the petitioner and her infant son and passing the order u/s 488, Criminal Procedure Code.