High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 09 KAR CK 0871

M/s Yankee Constructions LLP vs The State Of Karnataka & Ors.

Karnataka High Court, Bengaluru Bench · Decided on 1 September 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Suraj Govindaraj, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 24500 of 2026 (GM-TEN)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 420 words
1.

The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:

A. Issue a Writ of Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to implement the clear administrative directions passed by the Government of Karnataka (Respondent No. 1) vide Letter No. Va.E 14 HFA 2024 dated 03.07.2025 as per Annexure-E and immediately process, approve, and release the entire outstanding payment of Rs. 9,72,63,032/-(comprising the 13th and Final Bill, Clause 41 Price Escalation, and GST differential) to the Petitioner along with applicable interest for the period of delay.

B. Grant such other and further reliefs as this Honourable Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience.

2.

The petitioner claims to have been the successful tenderer for work of construction of 893 ground floor units including infrastructure at 11 selected slums in Rajajinagar and Mahalakshmipuram area in Bangalore City. An agreement has been entered into on 06.12.2018 and a work order also came to be issued on 06.12.2018. In pursuance of which, the petitioner is stated to have furnished bank guarantee as well as performance security and thereafter commenced the works which had been allotted to the petitioner. The petitioner claims that the petitioner has completed the work, despite such completion and bills having been raised, the respondents have not acted on the said bills and make payment of the due amounts.

3.

Whenever any bills are submitted to the employer, it is required for the employer to consider the same and pass necessary orders either accepting or rejecting the bills which have been raised in either case accompanied by reasons.

4.

In the present matter the petitioner claims to have submitted the bills on 09.03.2023. Such being the case, the said bills could not have been kept pending for such a long time. As such this Court passes the following;

ORDER

i.

The writ petition is allowed.

ii.

A mandamus is issued, directing respondents to consider the bills raised in terms of representation submitted by the petitioner on 16.10.2024 at Annexure-D and the administrative order dated 03.07.2025 at Annexure-E within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

iii.

It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the entitlement of the petitioner. The same would have to be considered on the basis of the tender documentation, the work done, the measurement books, verification thereof and necessary orders passed in accordance with law.