Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 03 NCLT CK 0558

M/s. VRJ Traders Pvt. Ltd. vs Alok Kumar Kuchhal

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 3 March 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.S.N Prasad, Member (Judicial) · Rahul Bhatnagar, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
I.A. 213/2022 In Company Petition No. (IB) – 151/(ND) /2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 484 words

Per SHRI. RAHUL BHATNAGAR, MEMBER (TECHNICAL)

1.

The present application is being filed by Mr. Alok Kumar Kuchhal (hereinafter referred to as “the Applicant/ Interim Resolution Professional”), under Section 60(5) of the I & B Code, 2016 for seeking direction/ order, praying for the following reliefs:

a. To pass appropriate directions for carrying out the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of the Corporate Debtor.

b. Pass such other or further order/ order(s) as may be deemed to fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the instant case.

2.

The facts in brief are that an application under Section 10 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for initiation of CIRP was filed by the Corporate Applicant which was admitted by this bench on 22nd December, 2021 and the applicant i.e. Mr. Alok Kumar Kuchhal was appointed as Interim Resolution Professional in the matter.

3.

That immediately after appointment, the applicant took steps to cause public announcement wherein creditors of the Corporate Debtor were called upon to submit their proof of claims on or before 05th January, 2022. The applicant had also taken steps to get the public announcement published in the newspapers Financial Express (English), New Delhi Edition and Jansatta New Delhi Edition on 25th December, 2021.

4.

Till last date of submission of claim i.e., till 05th January, 2022, the applicant had received claim from only one financial creditor. While verifying the claim form of the financial creditor, the applicant came to know of the fact that the claimant is having counter claim approximately to the tune of amount claimed and also of the fact that the claimant is a related party of the Corporate Debtor.

5.

That in terms of provisions of Section 21 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, the Interim Resolution Professional has to form the Committee Of Creditors (COC) immediately after verification of claim and needs to file the report of same with the Tribunal, but in the present case, the applicant could not form any COC for the sole reason that there is only one claimant and who is a related party. In the absence of COC, the applicant is unable to carry out the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process of the Corporate Debtor.

6.

In view of the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, the IRP is directed to scrutinize books of accounts of the Corporate Debtor and take proactive steps to identify the Operational Creditors and provide necessary guidance to them to file their claims and thereafter, explore the possibility to constitute COC in terms of Regulation 16, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Insolvency Resolution Process For Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016. A final attempt may also be made by the IRP by way of re-issuance of public announcement inviting claims of creditors.

7.

I.A. 213/2022 stands disposed of in terms of the above order.

Let a copy of order be served to parties.