High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 03 DEL CK 4029

M/s. Vishwas Overseas Inc. vs Commissioner Of Customs & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 20 March 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J · Ravinder Dudeja, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 1718/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 318 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1.

Petitioner seeks quashing of the provisional assessment of the bill of entry No. 9468278 dated 30.12.2023 and seeks unconditional release of the goods.

2.

Subject petition was filed claiming that the goods that were declared as Sri Lankan Origin Areca Nut were in fact of Sri Lankan origin. A Certificate of Origin was filed alongwith the bill of entry for clearance.

2.

On 19.02.2024, this Court noticed the submissions of learned counsel for the respondents that QR Code on the Certificate of origin was not verifiable through the online process. Accordingly, petitioner was directed to produce the original documents before the concerned officer.

3.

On 21.02.2024, the submission was made by learned counsel for the respondents that original document was produced however, on scanning of the QR Code, the link that opened was not the official link of the Sri Lankan Government, but a different link of a private website. Accordingly, the proper officer had sent the documents for physical verification to the Nodal Officer of Foreign Trade Agreement Cell and a response was awaited.

4.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that report has been received from the Department of Commerce, Columbo, Sri Lanka which has reported that the Certificate of Origin has not been issued by the Department of Commerce at Sri Lanka.

5.

Faced with the said communication learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition.

6.

Learned counsel for the respondents opposes the prayer for withdraw and submits that forged and fabricated document was submitted with the concerned authority and the official machinery was put into motion for the purposes of verification of the documents. He further submits that respondents reserve their rights to take appropriate action against petitioner.

7.

In view of the above, the petition is dismissed with costs of Rs 50,000/- to be deposited with the Custom Authorities within a period of two weeks.