High CourtsDivision Bench(2026) 07 TEL CK 1452

M/s. Surender Marketing vs The State Tax Officer & Ors.

Telangana High Court, Hyderabad · Decided on 30 July 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Aparesh Kumar Singh, C.J · G.M. Mohiuddin, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 24526 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 365 words

Heard Mr. Jillella Rajeswara Rao, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, in virtual mode and Mr. Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax appearing for the respondents.

2.

This writ petition is filed for the following relief:

"...to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the Order in Ref.No ZD3612251206841 and summary of the order in Form GST DRC-07, dated 31.12.2025, passed by the 1st respondent, for the period 2021-2022, as illegal, arbitrary, against the provisions of the GST Act and also against the principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the circumstances of the case."

3.

However, after some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal against the impugned orders. He submits that some delay might have been occurred in preferring the appeal and therefore, the same may be directed to be considered sympathetically.

4.

Learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax submits that the petitioner was at liberty to prefer an appeal against the impugned orders taking all the grounds as are available in law and on facts.

5.

However, upon hearing the learned counsel for the parties, since the petitioner seeks liberty to prefer an appeal, we do not wish to comment on the merits of the contentions raised by the parties.

6.

Accordingly, we grant liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal within a period of two weeks with statutory pre-deposit and a delay condonation application. The petitioner may take all such grounds in law and on facts in the memo of appeal as are available to it. Needless to say, the appellate authority would consider the question of delay taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case and if it is satisfied on the point of delay, proceed to decide the appeal on merits in accordance with law.

7.

The Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.