Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2022) 01 NCLT CK 0356

M/s. State Bank Of India vs M/s. Babita Nayar

National Company Law Tribunal · Decided on 7 January 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bachu Venkat Balaram Das, Member (Judicial) · Narender Kumar Bhola, Member (Technical)
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
IB-696 (ND)/2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 372 words

Counsel for the Applicant is present. Counsel has taken us through the present application which is filed under Section 95 of the Code seeking initiation of Insolvency proceedings against the Personal Guarantor namely, Mrs. Babita Nayar w/o Mr. Rakesh Nair. Counsel for the Applicant submits that he has made complete compliance with regard to order dated 09.12.2021 and has filed to proof of service of the present petition on the Personal Guarantor. Counsel for the Applicant proposed the name of Insolvency Professional namely, Mr. Ashish Agarwal having Reg. No. IBBI/IPA-001/IP-P00688/2017-2018/11165to act as Resolution Professional in the matter. This application as filed by the State Bank of India its duly authorized Counsel is admitted and the said Insolvency Professional namely, Mr. Ashish Agarwal is hereby appointed in terms of Section 95 of the Code. The said Resolution Professional shall conduct an enquiry within 10 days from the date of his appointment recommending for approval or rejection of the application.

It is further confirms that interim moratorium in terms of Section 96 of the IBC, 2016 has commenced from the date of application. Section 96 Interim Moratorium is as follows:-

Interim moratorium – (1) When an application is filed under Section 94 or Section 95-

(a)

an interim moratorium shall commence on the date of the application in relation to all the debts and shall cease to have effect on the date of admission of such application; and

(b)

during the interim moratorium period

(i)

any legal action or proceeding pending in respect of any debt shall be deemed to have been stayed; and

(ii)

the creditors of the debtor shall not initiate any legal action or proceedings in respect of any debt.

(2)

Where the application has been made in relation to a firm the interim moratorium under sub-section (1) shall operate against all the partners of the firm as on the date of the application

(3)

The provisions of sub-section (1) shall not apply to such transactions as may be notified by the Central Government in consultation with any financial sector regulator.

In terms of above the present application is disposed of as of now. However the matter be listed after filing of the report by the Resolution Professional after three weeks.