High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 02 DEL CK 4202

M/s NP Trading Co. vs Commissioner Of GST & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 9 February 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J · Ravinder Dudeja, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 1399/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 319 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1.

Petitioner seeks quashing of order dated 23.12.2021 whereby the CGST registration of the petitioner has been cancelled w.e.f. 01.07.2017.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner interalia submits that Show Cause Notice dated 05.11.2021 is itself defective in as much as it does not provide any details of the alleged invoices or bills which were made without supply of goods or services. He submits that no enquiry has been conducted to even certain as to which invoice or bill has been issued without any underlying supply. He further submits that since there were no details provided the petitioner was precluded from filing a reply to the Show Cause Notice.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that respondent shall furnish all the requisite details in support of the Show Cause Notice to the petitioner and thereafter adjudicate the Show Cause Notice afresh.

4.

In view of the above, the impugned order dated 23.12.2021 is set aside. Respondents are directed to furnish all material that they possess in support of the Show Cause Notice dated 05.11.2021 to the petitioner within one week. Petitioner shall file a reply within a period of seven working days thereof. Respondents shall thereafter adjudicate the Show Cause Notice in accordance with law within a maximum period of two weeks of filing of the reply.

5.

It is clarified that this Court has neither considered nor committed on the merits of contentions of either party. Proper Officer shall adjudicate the Show Cause Notice uninfluenced by anything stated in this order on merits. He shall pass a detailed speaking order after giving an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.

6.

Needless to say that the petitioner shall be entitled to avail of such remedies as may be available in law in case aggrieved by any further order passed by the Proper Officer.

7.

Petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.