Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2019) 07 NCLT CK 0660

M/s. Dhandhania Brothers Pvt. Ltd. vs M/s. Bhoruka Power Corp. Ltd.

National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench · Decided on 31 July 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajeswara Rao Vittanala, Member (Judicial) · Ashok Kumar Mishra, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
C.P. (IB) No.198/BB/2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

8 paragraphs · 323 words

Per: Dr. Ashok Kumar Mishra, Member (Technical)

1.

C.P. (IB) No.198/BB/2018 is filed by M/s. Dhandhania Brothers Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as ‘Petitioner/Financial Creditor’) under Section 7 of the IBC, 2016 read with Rule 4 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016, by inter alia seeking to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against M/s.Bhoruka Power Corporation Limited (hereinafter referred to as 'Respondent/Corporate Debtor') on the ground that it has committed default for a total outstanding amount of Rs.31,99,013/- (Rupees Thirty One Lakhs Ninety Nine Thousand and Thirteen Only) including interest.

1.

The case was listed for admission on various dates viz. 01.11.2018, 26.11.2018, 10.12.2018, 31.12.2018, 24.01.2019, 28.02.2019, 28.03.2019, 24.04.2019, 10.05.2019, 28.05.2019, 31.05.2019, 09.07.2019, 15.07.2019, 26.07.2019 and 31.07.2019. The case stands adjourned on those dates due to various reasons, at the request of the parties for completion of the pleadings; to settle the issue, etc.

2.

Heard Shri Arjun Rao, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Shri Samarth Shreedhar, learned Counsel for the Respondent. We have carefully perused the pleadings of the parties and extant provisions of the Code.

3.

Shri Samarth Shreedhar, learned Counsel for the Respondent has filed a Memo for production of documents dated 31.07.2019 (which is taken on record) along with RTGS details of having disbursed the full amount due to the Petitioner/Financial Creditor. Therefore, the learned Counsel submits that the issue has been resolved amicably between the parties and the Petition may be disposed of accordingly.

5.

Shri Arjun Rao, learned Counsel for the Petitioner has also agreed about the settlement of the issue and submit that the Tribunal may dispose of the same.

6.

Since the case is not yet admitted by the Tribunal, we are inclined to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the instant Company Petition.

7.

In the result, C.P. (IB) No.198/BB/2018 is disposed of as withdrawn in terms of settlement between the parties. No order as to costs.