High CourtsDivision Bench(2024) 03 DEL CK 3663

M/s Brijbihari Concast Pvt. Ltd. vs Director General Directortae General Of Goods And Services Tax Intelligence Meerurt Zonal Unit & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 March 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J · Ravinder Dudeja, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 3832/2024 & CM. APPLS. 15717-18/2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 215 words

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL)

1.

Petitioner impugns order dated 18.12.2023, whereby the bank account of the petitioner has been provisionally attached under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017.

2.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner has objected to the said provisional attachment and filed a representation dated 19.01.2024, which was dispatched on 03.02.2024. He submits that despite service of the same, it has not yet been disposed of.

3.

Issue Notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for respondents. With the consent of parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal.

4.

Learned counsel for respondents submits that objections are pending consideration before the Competent Authority and assures that the same shall be disposed of within a period of two weeks from today. Assurance is accepted.

5.

In view of the above, petition is disposed of, directing the Competent Authority to decide the objections filed by the petitioner to the provisional attachment within a period of two weeks from today. An opportunity of personal hearing shall also be granted to the petitioner while disposing of objections. Needless to say, it would be open to the petitioner to avail of such further remedies as may be permissible in law in case petitioner is aggrieved by any further order passed.