Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2023) 02 NCLT CK 3439

M/s Bharat Overseas vs Ragni International Private Limited

National Company Law Tribunal, Kolkata Bench · Decided on 7 February 2023

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bidisha Banerjee, Member (Judicial) · Balraj Joshi, Member (Technical)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
IA(IBC)/1083/KB/2021 in C.P (IB) No.2168/KB/2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

13 paragraphs · 321 words

O R D E R

Per: Bidisha Banerjee, Member (Judicial)

1.

Ld. Counsel for the parties was heard.

2.

This IA has been filed by the Operational Creditor with prayer to recall the order dated 02/11/2021 passed by this Tribunal and restore the petition CP No. 2168 /KB/2019.

3.

It is noticed that on 02/11/2021, this Tribunal noted that nobody appeared on behalf of the Operational Creditor on 15/10/2020 and the same is dismissed for default, having recorded as under :_

1.

Nobody presents for the Operational Creditor. Ld. Counsel for the Corporate Debtor present.

2.

It would appear from the record that nobody appeared on behalf of the Operational Creditor on 15/10/2020, 14/12/2020, 01/02/2021, 24/03/2021 and also today. It indicates that the Operational Creditor is not interested in pursuing the matter. CP is dismissed in default of non- appearance.

3.

File be consigned to the Records”.

4.

The present application has been filed on 02/11/2021 under Rule 48 (2) of the NCLT Rules, 2016. Contents of which~ read as under:

“ Where the petition or application has been dismissed for default and the applicant files an application within thirty days from the date of dismissal and satisfies the Tribunal that there was sufficient cause for his non-appearance when the petition or the application was called for hearing, the Tribunal shall make an order restoring the same; Provided that where the case was disposed of on merits the decision shall not be re-opened”.

5.

In view of the fact that the application was filed within 30 days as provided in the Rules but not by way of an appropriate application, the present IA is dismissed with liberty to the applicant to come with a fresh one in accordance with rules.

6.

Accordingly, IA(IBC)/1083/KB/2021 is dismissed with the liberty.

7.

Certified copy of the order may be issued to all the concerned parties, if applied for, upon compliance with all requisite formalities.