Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2019) 12 NCLT CK 0743

M/s. ABT Parcel Services vs M/s. LCM Logistics Pvt. Ltd.

National Company Law Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench · Decided on 2 December 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajeswara Rao Vittanala, Member (Judicial) · Ashutosh Chandra, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
C.P. (IB)No.221/BB/2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

20 paragraphs · 632 words

Per: Rajeswara Rao Vittanala, Member (Judicial)

1.

C.P.(IB)No.221/BB/2019 is filed by M/s. ABT Parcel Services (‘Petitioner/Operational Creditor’), U/s. 9 of the IBC, 2016, R/w Rule 6 of I&B (AAA) Rules, 2016, by inter alia seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) in respect of M/s. LCM Logistics Pvt. Ltd. ('Respondent/Corporate Debtor') on the ground that it has committed default for an amount of Rs.30,25,600/- (Rupees Thirty Lakhs Twenty Five Thousand Six Hundred only) plus interest @ 18% p.a.

2.

The case was listed for admission on various dates viz., 01.07.2019, 09.07.2019, 17.07.2019, 01.08.2019, 07.08.2019, 20.08.2019, 03.09.2019, 16.09.2019, 27.09.2019, 14.10.2019, 25.10.2019, 18.11.2019, 27.11.2019 and on 02.12.2019. The case was adjourned on these dates at the requests of the parties, on one ground or the other including to settle the issue in question.

3.

Heard Shri R. Ashok Kumar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Shri Govindaraddi L Kurtakoti, learned PCS for the Respondent. We have carefully perused the pleadings of both the parties and extant provisions of the Code and Rules made there under.

4.

Shri R. Ashok Kumar, learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the parties are settled the issue between themselves by executing Joint Memo of Settlement dated 02.12.2019. Therefore, he urged the Adjudicating Authority to withdraw the instant Company Petition subject to compliance with the terms as mentioned in the said Joint Memo of Settlement.

5.

Both the Counsel have also placed the Joint Memo of Settlement dated 02.12.2019 (which is taken on record) which reads as under:

“the Corporate Debtor has agreed to pay a sum of Rs.30,25,000 (Rupees Thirty Lakhs Twenty Five Thousand only) in full and final settlement of the claims in the instant Company Petition. The Corporate Debtor undertakes to pay the settlement amount in six installments by post dated Cheques drawn on Karnataka Bank Ltd, Mahalakshmipuram Branch, Bangalore – 560 086 in favor of ABT Parcel Service as detailed below:

Sl. NoCheque No.DateAmount in
101075231st December 20195,25,000
201075331st January 20205,00,000
301075429th February 20205,00,000
401075531st March 20205,00,000
501075730th April 20205,00,000
601075831st May 20205,00,000
Total30,25,000

The Corporate Debtor confirms and undertakes that the above cheques will be honored on their due dates. The Operational Creditor agrees to withdraw the said Petition and undertakes not to make any further claim or litigation in future in respect of the claims there under. The Operational Creditor agrees to drop the legal proceedings, if any, relating to the claims in the above Company Petition, against the Corporate Debtor.

The Operational Creditor shall have the right to move this Bench with appropriate Company Petition in the event of default of any one of the installments as mentioned above and by not honoring the cheques on the dates mentioned above.”

6.

Shri Govindaraddi L Kurtakoti, learned PCS for the Respondent confirmed that they have settled the issue by executing the Joint Memo of Settlement and they will honor the settlement of the payment as mentioned in the said Joint Memo of Settlement dated 02.12.2019 without fail.

7.

Since the Company Petition is not yet admitted by the Adjudicating Authority, and the parities themselves have settled the issue, we are inclined to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the instant Company Petition with a liberty to file fresh Company Petition, in case, the Corporate Debtor failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the payment as mentioned in the said Joint Memo of Settlement dated 02.12.2019.

8.

In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, C.P.(IB)No.221/BB/2019 is hereby disposed of as withdrawn by directing the Corporate Debtor to strictly adhere to the terms and conditions as mentioned in the said Joint Memo of Settlement dated 02.12.2019 without fail, failing which the Petitioner is at liberty to file fresh Company Petition in accordance with law. No order as to costs.