High CourtsSingle Bench(2010) 06 MAD CK 0171

M. Rukmani vs The Assistant Commissioner Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department and The Bill Clerk

Madras High Court · Decided on 30 June 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.B.K. Vasuki, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 50362 of 2006 and M.P. No. 1 of 2006

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 407 words

K.B.K. Vasuki, J.—On consent, the writ petition is taken up for final hearing.

2.

The writ petition is filed for issuance of writ of mandamus for forbearing the respondents herein from discontinuing the supply of food articles to

the Family Card bearing No. 01/G/0068677 standing in the name of the petitioner''s husband.

3.

The petitioner herein, got married to one Manoharan and while they were living together, the Family Card was obtained in the name of her

husband as head of the family. Her name is included in the same in the capacity of wife of the said Manoharan and there was no difficulty in getting

the supply of food articles in the said Family Card, till the matrimonial dispute arose between the husband and wife resulting in Civil Suit in O.S.

No. 5482 of 2006. Even after the separation of the husband and wife, the petitioner was getting the supply of food articles for the same Family

Card. The petitioner has during the pendency of the Civil Suit, shifted her residence to V.P. Colony, North Street where she approached the

authority concerned for entering change of address in the ration card and the same was postponed and pending making entry of the change of

address in the ration card, the supply of food articles is also refused for the ration card from the shop within the jurisdiction of which, the petitioner

is presently residing. In the meantime, her husband was also insisting her to surrender the ration card which compelled her to cause a legal notice to

the respondents to effect the change of address and to supply the food articles. The failure on the part of the authority concerned to comply with

her request, this writ came to be filed. She approached this Court for the relief as stated supra along with M.P. No. 1 of 2006 for interim direction.

In pursuance of the interim order granted in M.P., the supply of food articles is restored for the ration card standing in the name of her husband and

the supply continues till today. In the meantime, the change of address is also entered in the ration card.

4.

That being so, this Court deems it fit to direct the respondents to continue to supply the food articles to the petitioner for the petition mentioned

Family Card.

5.

With the above observation, this writ petition is disposed of. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.