High CourtsSingle Bench(1996) 11 KAR CK 0042

M. Ravishankar vs R. Pushpa

Karnataka High Court · Decided on 26 November 1996 · Citation: (1998) 1 CivCC 250 : (1998) 1 DMC 197 : (1997) 4 KarLJ 543

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. Venkataraman, J
CASE NUMBER
Civil Revision Petition No. 2949 of 1996

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 179 words

S.Venkataraman, J.—Though this matter has come up for admission, as both sides are represented the matter is heard on merits. The Lower Court has awarded an interim maintenance of Rs. 1,200 /- per month. The grievance of the petitioner is that he is getting only a net income of Rs. 1,673.58 Ps. and the awarding of interim maintenance is grossly excessive. It is seen that the petitioner is getting a salary of Rs. 6,600/- and odd, out of which Rs. 5,000/- and odd is shown as deductions. Some of the loans such as F.A., L.I.C. premium, P.P. loan, etc; cannot be taken into account for the purpose of determining the resources of the petitioner. However, taking into consideration the Income Tax, P.P. and the house building loan deductions, it would be reasonable to fix an interim maintenance of Rs. 1,000/- per month subject to appropriate fixation at the final hearing. For the above reasons, this revision petition is partly allowed and the order of the Lower Court is modified by fixing the interim maintenance at Rs. l,000/- per month.