High CourtsSingle Bench(2012) 11 MAD CK 0056

M. Raja Gounder vs The Commissioner, Commercial Taxes Department, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005

Madras High Court · Decided on 9 November 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
R. Sudhakar, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 29516 of 2012 and M.P. No. 1 of 2012

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 399 words

Honourable Mr. Justice R. Sudhakar

1.

This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to respondent''s order made in letter

No. Sattakuzhu-4/31258/2012 dated 9.10.2012 to quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to grant tax exemption for re-release

the film of ""Vasantha Maaligai"" forthwith thereto. Heard Mr. L. Chandrakumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Aditya Reddy, learned

Government Advocate (Tax) for the respondent.

2.

Petitioner seeks exemption of entertainment tax for re-release of the Tamil Movie, ""Vasantha Maaligai"". The request for grant of exemption from

entertainment tax has been declined and returned referring to G.O.Ms. No. 002 Commercial Tax and Registration(C1) Department dated

3.1.2012, stating that Form ""A"" does not contain the proper enclosure as provided in the said G.O. The letter returning the request is under

challenge.

3.

On going through the G.O.Ms. No. 002 dated 3.1.2012, the two reasons given in the impugned proceedings, that is non furnishing of lyrics and

non furnishing of Dialogues does not appear to be a condition precedent for grant of tax exemption.

4.

In any event, according to the petitioner, the admitted fact is that the movie is a Tamil Movie. The respondent should only consider the various

clauses contained in the G.O.Ms. No. 002 dated 3.1.2012, whereas the reasons given in the impugned proceedings are alien to the conditions of

the G.O.Ms. No. 002 dated 3.1.2012. On this premise learned counsel for the petitioner seeks a direction to reconsider the request of the

petitioner for grant of exemption.

5.

The Government Advocate appearing for the respondent states that the authority will consider the request of the petitioner in terms of the

G.O.Ms. No. 002 dated 3.1.2012 on the above stated plea. The authority will also consider the examination of the movie by the appropriate

committee if it is required as per the Government Order and then consider the petitioner''s claim on merits.

6.

In such circumstances, the respondent authority is directed to place the matter before the appropriate committee as applicable for viewing and

to consider the claim in terms of the G.O.Ms. No. 002 dated 3.1.2012 and pass appropriate orders on merits expeditiously, preferably, within a

period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. The Writ Petition is ordered as above. No costs. Consequently, connected

miscellaneous petition is closed.