High CourtsSingle Bench(1971) 06 MAD CK 0021

M. Natesa Reddy vs The Sub-Magistrate, Trivellore and Others

Madras High Court · Decided on 23 June 1971 · Citation: (1971) LW(Cri) 231

HON’BLE JUDGES
Somasundaram, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal M.P. No. 1023 of 1971

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 242 words

Somasundaram, J.

S. 190 of the Criminal Procedure Code relates to the Magistrate taking cognisance of offences. Cognisance of any offence may be taken (a) upon receiving a complaint of facts which constitute such offence, (b) upon a Report in writing of such facts made by any police officer or (c) upon information received from any person other than a police officer, or upon his own knowledge or suspicion, that such offence has been, committed. Under a Cl.(3) of S. 156, Magistrate empowered under S. 190 may order an investigation by a police officer. The provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code do not empower the Magistrate to ask the police officer to submit a charge-sheet. If, however, the Magistrate is of opinion that the report submitted by the police requires further investigation, the Magistrate may order investigation under S. 156(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code. Directing a further investigation is entirely different from asking the police to submit a charge-sheet Vide Chatterji v. Haridar Kuar Sing 1970 L.W. (Crl.) S.C. 259. The Magistrate in this case has directed an investigation to be made by the police. He has not directed them to file a charge-sheet. On receipt of the report under S. 173(4) he may take the case on, file or dismiss it under S. 203, Crl. P.C. The Petitioner''s contention that the Magistrate has no jurisdiction to direct an investigation, is without substance. The petition falls and the same is dismissed.