High CourtsDivision Bench(2006) 06 MAD CK 0184

M. Jothi, SP. Subbiah and S. Maga Mayee vs The Director of School Education, The District Educational Officer, The Additional Assistant Elementary Educational Officer and Muthathal Middle School

Madras High Court · Decided on 15 June 2006

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Dhanapalan, J · P. Sathasivam, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Appeal No''s. 569 to 571 of 2000

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 260 words

P. Sathasivam, J.—Against the common order dated 04.02.2000 made in W.P. Nos. 1983 to 1985 of 2000 dismissing all the writ petitions

challenging G.O. Ms. No. 559 Education Science and Technology Department dated 11.07.1995, the petitioners therein have filed the present

appeals.

2.

Heard the learned Counsel for the appellants and Mrs. Bhavani Subbarayan, learned Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 3.

3.

It is not in dispute that the validity of the G.O.Ms. No. 559 Education Science and Technology Department dated 11.07.1995 has been upheld

by the decision of Division Bench of this Court reported in 2002 Writ Law Reporter 173(Secretary And Correspondent, Uswathun Hasana

Oriental (Arabic) Girls Higher Secondary School, Pallapathi 639 205, Karur District v. The State of Tamil Nadu and Four Ors.). In such

circumstances, following the same, these writ appeals are liable to be dismissed and accordingly, the same are dismissed. No costs.

4.

Learned Counsel appearing for the appellants submits that in view of various subsequent orders passed by the Government and of the fact that

the appellants are continuing in the posts of Secondary Grade Assistant, they seek direction from this Court that their claim may be considered by

the Government sympathetically.

5.

The appellants are permitted to make a representation to the first respondent viz., Director of School Education, Chennai-6, highlighting their

stand supported by the Government orders, if any. If any such representation is made to the first respondent, the said authority is directed to

consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law expeditiously, if the same is permissible.