High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 07 MAD CK 0498

M. Eswara Gounder, E. Sellammal, M. Padmavathi and S. Baby vs S. Subathra and Kavya rep. by his mother guardian S. Subaratha

Madras High Court · Decided on 6 July 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
T. Sudanthiram, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal O.P. No. 14395 of 2011 and M.P. No''s. 1 and 2 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 222 words

T. Sudanthiram, J.—This petition is filed to quash the Proceedings in D.V.A. No. 3/2011 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No. 1, Pollachi, Coimbatore District.

2.

The learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the proceedings in this case in DVA. No. 3/2011 before the Judicial Magistrate No. I, Pollachi, Coimbatore District is clearly an abuse of process of law and the application itself not in conformity with Rule 6(1) and Form II and and as such, the learned Magistrate ought not to have entertained the application.

3.

This Court considered the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the Petitioners and perused the records.

4.

Rule(6)(1) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Rules, 2006 reads as follows:

Every application of the aggrieved person u/s 12 shall be in form II or as nearly as possible thereto.

Every application of the aggrieved person u/s 12 shall be in From II or as nearly as possible. This rule intends that an application of the aggrieved person should be in Form II, but at the same time, it intends that even otherwise, it may be as nearly as possible thereto. Therefore, even assuming that the application is not in the prescribed Form II, it may not affect the proceedings.

5.

Hence this petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.