High CourtsSingle Bench(2004) 06 MAD CK 0028

M. Bhaskara Rao and K. Adamu vs The Commanding Officer

Madras High Court · Decided on 29 June 2004

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.K. Rajan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition Nos.15393 and 15394 of 1997

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

27 paragraphs · 279 words

A.K. Rajan, J.—This writ petition has been filed for the issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the record in file

No.401/Civ Est/97 dated 21.2.1997 on the file of the respondent and to quash the same.

2.

The impugned order reads as follows:

CTC Tele 6384023/4041

Sainik Aspatal

Military Hospital

Avadi, Chennai 54.

401/Civ Est/97

District Employment Office

Employment Exchange Officer

Thiruvaallur, Chenngai MGR District

Tiruvallur.

Recruitment of GP ''D'' civilians

1.

Please refer to this office letter No.401/Civ Est/97 dated 30 Dec 96 addressed to HQ ATNKK & G Area (Med) and copy endorsed to you.

2.

It is submitted for your information that the following selected candidate for the post of safaiwala could not be appointed due to one time

relaxation on ban on direct recruitment has already been over as on 31st December, 1996. Vide HQ letter NO.727/1/M-3(IA) dated 30 January,

1997.

Sd/-....

Randhir singh)

Major Offg

Commanding Offr

From this, it is seen it is only information sent by the Sainik Aspatal, Military Hospital, Avadi, Chennai to the District Employment Office,

Employment Exchange Officer, Thiruvallur Chengai District, Tiruvallur, that the selected list of candidates for the post of Safaiwala cannot be

appointed due to the fact that the one time relaxation of ban on direct recruitment lapsed as on 31st December, 1996. Mere selection does not

create any right on the selected candidates. Hence, this letter does not affect any of the right of the petitioner. It is not an order affecting the rights

of any person. Therefore, there is no merit in the writ petition.

3.

In the result, both the writ petitions are dismissed as devoid of merits. No costs.