High CourtsSingle Bench(2011) 03 MAD CK 0182

M. Ahmed Ameen vs The Commissioner Corporation of Chennai and The Assistant Revenue Officer Revenue Department Zone II Corporation of Chennai

Madras High Court · Decided on 7 March 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
M. Jaichandren, J
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 4066 of 2011

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 248 words

M. Jaichandren, J.—The Petitioner has stated that a preliminary notice, dated 9.8.2007, had been issued by the Respondents proposing to

enhance the annual value, from Rs. 1,33,006/- to Rs. 2,41,223/-, with effect from II/2001-02, on the basis of the total area of 5,900, sq.ft.

2.

It has been further stated that the Petitioner had raised objections, in respect of the said notice, before the first Respondent, in the year, 2007.

However, a copy of the objections, said to have been raised by the Petitioner, had not been filed before this Court.

3.

In such circumstances, the Petitioner is directed to furnish a copy of the objections, said to have been filed in the year, 2007, before the first

Respondent, within ten days from today. Thereafter, the first Respondent shall consider the objections raised by the Petitioner, in respect of the

preliminary notice, dated 9.8.2007, and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks

thereafter. Till such appeal is disposed of, as directed by this Court, no action shall be taken by the Respondent against the Petitioner or his tenant,

with regard to the payment of the property tax, in respect of the premises No. 9, Mooker Nallamuthu Street, Chennai. However, it is made clear

that the Petitioner shall continue to pay the admitted property tax, in respect of the property in question.

The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. Connected M.P. No. 1 of 2011 is closed.