High Courts(1985) 01 P&H CK 0066

Ludhiana Improvement Trust vs Hari Shankar

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 22 January 1985 · Citation: (1985) 2 CurLJ 112 : (1985) 1 CurLJ 324 : (1985) PLJ 234 : (1986) RRR 540

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.C.Jain · A.C.J., J and I.S.Tiwana, J
CASE NUMBER
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1141 of 1981

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 197 words

P.C. Jain, A.C. J.

1.

The Ludhiana Improvement Trust has filed this appeal under clause X of the Letters Patent against the judgment of the learned Single Judge, dated 28th August, 1981, by which the writ petition filed by Hari Shankarrespondent, was allowed and compensation was enhanced.

2.

It is not necessary to state the facts as the same have been given in detail in the judgment of the learned Single Judge.

3.

The only contention raised before us by the learned counsel for the appellant is that the learned Single Judge should not have interfered with the determination of the compensation in exercise of his jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. A similar contention was raised before the learned Single Judge and was repelled on the ground that the Tribunal had ignored the relevant evidence. In our view, the learned Single Judge was right in going into the legality of the award of the Tribunal as the relevant evidence was ignored while determining the amount of compensation.

4.

No other point arises for consideration.

5.

For the reasons recorded, this appeal fails and is dismissed but we make no order as to costs.