Tribunals and Commissions(1990) 02 NCDRC CK 0003

LUCKNOW DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY-/Opp. Party vs NALINI PATIL

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission · Decided on 2 February 1990 · Citation: 1991 2 CPR 59 : 1992 2 CPJ 541 : 1993 1 CLT 387

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.Balakrishna Eradi , A.S.Vijayakar , Y.Krishan , Rais Ahmed J.
RESULT
Appeal dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 177 words
1.

-IN the light of the decisions rendered by us in U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Garima Shukla & Ors., I (1991) CPJ 1 (NC) - First Appeal No. 5 of 1989 dated 27th July, 1989 and First Appeal No. 6 & 7 1989 U.P. Avas Evam Vikas Parishad, Lucknow v. C.P. Sharma, I (1991) CPJ 7 (NC) dated 8th November, 1989, the contention raised by the appellant that the State Commission, U.P. acted without jurisdiction in entertaining and adjudicating upon the complaint preferred by the Respondent has only to be rejected. We do so.

2.

ON the merits of the case, notwithstanding the persuasive arguments advanced by the learned Counsel for the appellant, we do not find any error of fact or law in the order passed by the State Commission. No miscarriage of justice has also resulted from the order of the State Commission. In the circumstances, we decline to interfere with the impugned order of the State Commission. This appeal is, accordingly, dismissed. There will be no order as to costs. Appeal dismissed.