High CourtsDivision Bench(2025) 05 DEL CK 2033

Lt Col Badal Chandra Roy Retd vs Union Of India & Ors.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 19 May 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
C. Hari Shankar, J · Ajay Digpaul, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(C) 6657/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 150 words

C. Hari Shankar, J.

1.

The petitioner is an officer of Army. He seeks disability pension.

2.

Dr. Mahndiyan, learned Counsel for the Union of India, advances a preliminary objection that this writ petition is not maintainable as the jurisdiction in this case would lie before the Armed Forces Tribunal1.

3.

Mr. Gandharv Kumar Jha, learned Counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to prosecute this writ petition before the AFT treating it as an original application.

4.

Accordingly, we permit the petitioner to present the writ petition before the AFT.

5.

We request the AFT to treat it as an Original Application and deal with it in accordance with law.

6.

The Registry is directed to return the papers of this writ petition to the petitioner so that they could be presented before the learned AFT.

7.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

Footnotes

  1. 1.“AFT” hereinafter