Tribunals and CommissionsFull Bench(2024) 01 NCLAT CK 0030

Lovely Securities Pvt. Ltd. vs Nature India Communique Limited (Through Its Liquidator Sh. Prabhat Jain And Ors

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal · Decided on 11 January 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ashok Bhushan,Chairperson · Barun Mitra, Member (T) · Arun Baroka, Member (T)
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.26 Of 2024 & I.A. No.87 Of 2024

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 289 words
1.

This Appeal has been filed against the order dated 30.10.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority by which the Adjudicating Authority has rejected the Resolution Plan submitted by the Appellant. The Appellant has submitted a Resolution Plan to take the Corporate Debtor and resultantly the Appellant shall become a listed company. Appellant is not a listed company, however, the Corporate Debtor is a listed company.  In Para 28, the Adjudicating Authority made following observations:

“28. However, in view of the above discussion, this Adjudicating Authority is of the considered view that neither the Listing Status of the Corporate Debtor (Transferor Company) can automatically be transferred to the Successful Resolution Applicant (Transferee Company) nor the suspension of Listing can be invoked by virtue of the merger/amalgamation of the Corporate Debtor into the Successful Resolution Applicant, as the same would be in violation of Section 232(3)(h)(A) of the Companies Act, 2013. Therefore, the Resolution Plan in its present form which is in contravention of Section 232(3)(h) of the Companies Act, 2013 and is not legally implementable and hence, the same is hereby rejected as being violative of Section 30(2)(e) of the Code, 2016.”

2.

The  Adjudicating  Authority  took  the  view  that  the  plan  is  not  in compliance with the provision of the Companies Act, 2013.  We further notice that the total plan value of the Appellant was Rs.10 Lakh out of which Rs.6 Lakhs was CIRP Cost. The Adjudicating Authority has directed for liquidation. We  see  no  reason  to  interfere  with  the  impugned  order  passed  by  the Adjudicating Authority.  It was always open for the Appellant to participate in the liquidation process.  Appeal is dismissed.

Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the liquidation value given in Form H is NIL.