High CourtsSingle Bench(2019) 05 P&H CK 0023

Lovely @ Ladda vs State Of Punjab

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 8 May 2019

HON’BLE JUDGES
Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Miscellaneous Petition (M) No. 48208 Of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 319 words

Mahabir Singh Sindhu, J

Present petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr. P.C.') for grant of bail to the petitioner in FIR No.76 dated 24.04.2017, under Sections 323, 341, 506, 308, 148, 149 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short 'IPC'), registered at Police Station C Division, Amritsar.

It is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 26.11.2018 and after framing of charges, now the case is fixed for 18.05.2019 before the learned trial Court. It is further contended that there are total 18 prosecution witnesses and only one has been examined till date. Also contended that there is no other criminal case pending against the petitioner and even the matter has been compromised with the complainant.

The above factual position is duly acknowledged by learned State counsel, on instructions from Assistant Sub Inspector Harnek Singh.

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the paper book.

It transpires that on earlier occasion also, petitioner was ordered to be released on interim bail on 22.11.2018 and thereafter, he surrendered on 26.11.2018 and never misused the concession. Since the matter is stated to be compromised between the parties and there are total 18 prosecution witnesses, but only one has been examined, thus, the trial will take long time. Concededly, there is no other criminal case pending against the petitioner.

As a result thereof, this petition is allowed. The petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in this case, on his furnishing adequate bail bonds and surety bonds to the satisfaction of learned trial Court/Duty Magistrate concerned.

The above observations may not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merits of the case as well as of compromise between the parties.

However, it is clarified that petitioner shall fully co-operate with learned trial Court without seeking any unnecessary adjournments.