High CourtsDivision Bench(2018) 07 CHH CK 0214

Louis Tirkey vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 16 July 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ajay Kumar Tripathi, CJ · Pritinker Diwaker, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition (PIL) No. 139 Of 2017

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

18 paragraphs · 392 words

Ajay Kumar Tripathi, CJ

1.

The Petitioner claims himself to be a permanent resident of village Ranpur, Manjhatoli, Tahsil Bagicha, District Jashpur and is said to be a Panch of

the said village. Since a sub-station on behalf of the Electricity Department was said to be be established on a particular piece and parcel of land,

objections were raised that setting up of such sub-station would create problems for the Anganbadi Center which is running adjoining to the proposed

sub-station, plus, it will also create impediment in free movement of the villagers to visit their farmland as well as the pond situated in the village. A

direction was sought through the writ application for stoppage of the work, if not prevent establishment of the said sub-station.

2.

In terms of the directions issued from time to time, affidavits have been filed. The affidavits reflect that the sub-station has been set up in a

government land with due approval of the competent authorities keeping in mind all the safety aspect as well. It is also stated that a spot inspection of

the location was held and after participation of the Sarpanch and other members of the said village, it was agreed that the sub-station will not create

any kind of nuisance or cause any kind of danger to life or limb of the villagers of the village in question.

3.

In the affidavit of the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), on behalf of the District Magistrate, not only a Panchnama of the villagers have been

annexed but a decision of the Collector in relation to the objection of the Petitioner or some of the villagers has also been annexed which indicates that

the construction of the sub-station, in no manner creates any impediment in the free movement of the villagers since there is a concrete road running

around the sub-station which is more than 3.8 meters in width.

4.

We are satisfied that in the larger public interest, establishment of the sub- station is required whose construction has already been completed and

the same does not stand energised only because of the interim order which was passed by this Court earlier on 20.02.2018.

5.

The writ application is dismissed. The Respondents are now permitted to energize and electrify the sub-station which will now be available for

augmentation of supply of electricity in the area.