High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 06 CAL CK 0101

Lokenath Pramanick vs Union Of India

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 18 June 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Soumen Sen, J · Tirthankar Ghosh, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc. Case (Bail Application) (CRM) No. 2207 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 206 words

The petitioner undertakes to affirm and stamp the petition as per the Rules within 48 hours of resumption of normal functioning of the court. The

petition is taken up through videoconference on the basis of such undertaking.

The grievance of the petitioner relates to the manner in which the trial is being conducted.

The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for about five and half years and the progress of the trial is very slow.

Having considered the fact that the recovery of contraband in this case relates to 550 kg. of Ganja, we are not inclined to release the petitioner on bail

at this stage. However, we direct the learned Special Court being the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, 6th Court, Barasat, 24

Parganas (North) to expedite the progress of the trial and conclude the same preferably within one year from the date of regular resumption of

functioning of the court.

The trial court should not grant any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties and the prosecution as well as the accused are directed to

cooperate with the court for expediting such progress as directed above.

With the aforesaid observation CRM 2207 of 2020 is disposed of.