High CourtsSingle Bench(2018) 01 MAD CK 0486

L.Lingadurai vs The Superintendent of Police

Madras High Court · Decided on 10 January 2018

HON’BLE JUDGES
M.S.Ramesh
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
638 of 2018

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

22 paragraphs · 404 words
1.

It is the grievance of the petitioner that the respondent police has been harassing him under the guise of an enquiry/investigation and hence, has

invoked the inherent powers of this Court under Section 482 of Cr.P.C.

2.

An enquiry into a non cognizable offence or a cognizable offence is the unfettered powers of the Investigation Officers so long as the power to

investigate/enquire into these offences are legitimately exercised within the frame work of Chapter XII of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Though

the Code of Criminal Procedure empowers the Magistrate to be a guardian in all the stages of the police investigation, there is no power envisaging

him to interfere with the actual investigation or the mode of investigation. It is in this background that numerous petitions complaining of harassment

are being reported and filed before this Court seeking for directions to refrain the police officials from harassing the persons named in a complaint.

3.

This Court, exercising its power under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code normally would not interfere with the investigation

conducted by a police officer. Nevertheless, it would also not turn a blind eye to instances of harassment by the police under the guise of

investigation is brought to its notice.

4.

In the present case in hand, the petitioner has complained of harassment by the police based on a complaint and seeks for this Court''s

intervention by way of a direction. The term ''harassment'' by itself has a very wide meaning and hence, what could be harassment to the petitioner

may not be the same to the police officer.

5.

In order to circumvent such situations, the following guidelines are issued:

a)While summoning any persons named in the complaint or any witness to the incident complained of, the police officer shall summon such persons

through a written summon under Section 160 Cr.P.C., specifying a particular date and time for appearing before them for such an

enquiry/investigation.

b)The minutes of the enquiry shall be recorded in the general diary/station diary/daily diary of the police station.

c)The police officer shall refrain himself or herself from harassing persons called upon for enquiry/investigation.

d)The guidelines stipulated for preliminary enquiry or registration of FIR by the Hon''ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari Vs. Government of Uttar

Pradesh and others [2014 (2) SCC (1)] shall be strictly adhered to.

6.

With the above observations and direction, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed.