Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2003) 05 SC CK 0045

Liyaqat Ali vs Union of India (UOI) and Others

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 2 May 2003 · Citation: (2004) 5 CTC 608

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. N. Variava, J · B. N. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W. P. (Crl. ) No. 49 of 2003

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 229 words
1.

This writ petition, under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, is filed on the basis that in respect of Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 there is a conflict of decision between the case of Namdi Francis Nwazor Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Another, and the cases of Sarjudas and Another Vs. State of Gujarat, and State of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh, . In our view there is no conflict. Law on the subject is very clear and it is as laid down in the cases of Sarjudas and Another Vs. State of Gujarat, and State of Punjab Vs. Baldev Singh, . In the case of Nambi Francis Nwazor, the question whether Section 50 would be applicable if the seizure is from a bag carried by the person did not arise at all. In that case the seized articles were brought from some other place to the place where search took place and then it was held that Section 50 did not apply. The question whether Section 50 would apply if the search and seizure are from a bag being carried by the accused did not arise for consideration. The observations relied upon are mere passing observations which are per-incuriam. Therefore, the law is as set out in the other two judgments.

2.

This petition is disposed of with this clarification.