High CourtsFull Bench(1911) 02 BOM CK 0018

Lingam Krishna Bhupati Devu Guru vs Sri Mirza Sri Pusapati Vijayarama Gajapatiraj Maharaja of Vizianagram

Bombay High Court · Decided on 15 February 1911 · Citation: (1911) 13 BOMLR 447

HON’BLE JUDGES
Robson, J · Macnaghten, J · Arthur Wilson, J · Ameer Ali, J
RESULT
Dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 128 words

Macnaghten, J.—It seems to their Lordships that this case is perfectly clear and the judgment appealed from perfectly right.

2.

The mortgagee advanced a large sum of money on terms very favourable to the mortgagor. At the same time he retained the position of a simple mortgagee. That is so expressed in the deed itself. The mortgagor has not fulfilled the obligations he undertook. After prolonged forbearance and fifteen years after the mortgage was made, the mortgagee, whose interest is greatly in arrear, comes forward and says: "I am a simple mortgagee," and he asks the Court to enforce his rights. The decree was a matter of course.

3.

Their Lordships will therefore humbly advise His Majesty to dismiss the appeal and the appellant must pay the costs.