High CourtsSingle Bench(2026) 10 CHH CK 2489

Lilambar Yadav vs State Of Chhattisgarh & Ors.

Chhattisgarh High Court, Bilaspur · Decided on 15 October 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Amitendra Kishore Prasad, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
WPC No. 5286 of 2026

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 284 words

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad

1.

The petitioner, in this Writ Petition, has prayed for the following reliefs:-

“10.1

Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly in the nature of mandamus, directing the respondent No.7/HDB Financial Services Limited, Branch Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G) to examine the loan account pertaining to vehicle bearing Registration No. CG-14-MR-5068 and, in accordance with the terms of the financing agreement and applicable law, restrain the respondent no.7 from accepting delayed/defaulted EMIs from third party/respondent no. 8;

10.2

Direct the respondent No.7/HDB Financial Services Limited, Branch Pathalgaon, District Jashpur (C.G) to take appropriate measures in respect of the defaults committed in repayment of the loan, particularly with respect to repossession of the vehicle, and hand-over the same to the petitioner, in accordance with law;

10.3

Direct the Respondent No.4 and 5 to consider and decide the written complaint submitted by the petitioner concerning vehicle bearing Registration No. CG-14-MR-5068, in accordance with law and within a time-bound period;

10.4

Direct the respondent authorities, particularly respondent no. 3 to 5 to ensure that the vehicle is not permitted to be used on public roads in violation of the mandatory requirements of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, including the requirement of valid insurance;

10.5

Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper, may also be passed in favour of the petitioners together with cost of the petition.”

2.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the concerned Bank for redressal of his grievance.

3.

Permission is granted.

4.

Accordingly, this Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for.