High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 06 KL CK 0008

Ligiya Jose vs State Of Kerala

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 1 June 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
N. Nagaresh, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 11621 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 270 words

N. Nagaresh, J

1.

The petitioner states that she started continuous service as Higher Secondary School Teacher (Junior) (Mathematics) in St. Mary’s H.S.S.,

Kidangoor from 30.06.2010. She had approved but broken services under the same corporate management, prior thereto. Her probation was declared

taking into account the said approved broken periods of service.

2.

The petitioner would contend that she became eligible for the First Time Bound Higher Grade on completion of eight years service inclusive of the

broken periods, on 03.05.2015. But, the proposal for grant of First Time Bound Higher Grade to the petitioner with effect from 03.05.2015 was

rejected by the Regional Deputy Director on the ground that broken periods of service cannot be counted for grant of First Time Bound Higher Grade.

3.

A review petition filed by the petitioner was also rejected, as per Ext.P6. Aggrieved by Ext.P4 and Ext.P6, the petitioner has filed Ext.P8 appeal

before the Secretary to Government, General Education Department through proper channel. But, the same is not being considered.

4.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader representing the respondents 1 to 3.

5.

As the petitioner has preferred Ext.P8 appeal before the 1st respondent, this Court is of the view that the 1st respondent shall consider the same

within a reasonable time. In the circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P8 appeal filed by the

petitioner within a period of two months, after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The 1st respondent will be at liberty to adopt virtual

mode/video conferencing, for hearing the petitioner.