High CourtsSingle Bench(2021) 07 UK CK 0140

Leelawati vs Dilip Singh Kunwar & Another

Uttarakhand High Court · Decided on 22 July 2021

HON’BLE JUDGES
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Contempt Petition No. 188 Of 2021

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 430 words

Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1.

This Contempt Petition has been filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 17.03.2021 passed by Division Bench of this Court in Criminal

Writ Petition No. 457 of 2021. By the said order, respondents were directed to immediately provide police protection to the petitioner, not only for

protecting her life; but, also to protect her movable and immovable properties from respondent nos. 4 to 7 in the writ petition.

2.

A response affidavit has been filed on behalf of respondent no. 2. The stand taken by the respondents in the response affidavit is that petitioner has

two houses, out of which, one is possessed by petitioner herself; while, another house is possessed by her two daughters.

3.

Learned Standing Counsel submits that petitioner wants her daughters to be dispossessed from another house under the garb of the order dated

17.03.2021 passed by Division Bench of this Court. He also submits that daughters of the petitioner can be dispossessed from the said house only

after the judgment by competent Court of law and a Civil Suit is already pending between the parties before learned Civil Judge, Khatima. Thus,

according to learned Standing Counsel, it is not a case of willful disobedience and the respondents have provided full security to the petitioner, not only

for protecting her life; but, also to protect her movable and immovable properties. In support of his submission, he has referred to paragraph no. 5 of

the said affidavit, wherein it has been stated that police protection is being provided to the petitioner and for her properties by the concerned police

station on day-to-day basis and entry regarding the same is being made in the general diary of the police. The copy of general diary has been brought

on record as Annexure No. CA-1 to the response affidavit.

4.

This Court finds substance in the submission made by learned Standing Counsel. Petitioner cannot be put back in the house by evicting her

daughters by the police authorities in terms of the interim order passed by Division Bench of this Court. Such a relief can only be granted by the

Competent Civil Court.

5.

Since the only direction issued to the respondents was to provide protection to the petitioner and, as per the statement made in the response

affidavit, such protection is being granted, therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that it is not a case of willful disobedience of the order

passed by this Court.

6.

Accordingly, the contempt petition is closed. Contempt notices issued to the respondents are hereby discharged.