High CourtsDivision Bench(2025) 12 DEL CK 2630

Laxmi vs State NCT Of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 17 December 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vivek Chaudhary, J · Manoj Jain, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
W.P.(CRL) 2704/2025 & CRL.M.A. 37851/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 309 words
1.

The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS”),seeking issuance of writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus, directing the respondents to recover the minor daughter of the petitioner and produce her before this Court.

2.

The next date fixed in the present matter was 22.12.2025, but the matter has been taken up today on the request of learned Standing Counsel for the State as the girl in question has been recovered and is present in Court today.

3.

Learned Standing Counsel for the State informs that the girl was residing with her father and her father is also present in Court today. It is informed that the statement of the girl under Section 164 Cr.PC / Section 183 BNSS, is to be recorded today and, thereafter, she would be produced before Child Welfare Committee (“CWC”) for further necessary directions.

4.

We have made inquiries from the girl in our chamber who is willing to go with her father and has serious reservation in going with her mother.

5.

The Court Master was asked to contact learned counsel for the petitioner but we have been informed that the concerned counsel did not answer the call.

6.

Be that as it may, the present petition is in the nature of Habeas Corpus and the prayer is restricted to recovery of minor daughter of the petitioner, the same stands answered. If the petitioner, being her mother is desirous of having her custody, she is always, at liberty to make appropriate request before CWC.

7.

Resultantly, no further direction is required in the present writ petition and the petition is disposed of in aforesaid terms.

8.

Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.

9.

The next date of hearing also stands cancelled.