High CourtsSingle Bench(2022) 07 MP CK 0077

Laxmi Balai vs Ministry Of Home Through Principal Secretary Vallabh And Others

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 22 July 2022

HON’BLE JUDGES
Vijay Kumar Shukla, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Writ Petition No. 16798 Of 2022

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 279 words

Vijay Kumar Shukla, J

This petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India being aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the State authorities in not investigating the Crime No.0029/2022.

It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that on the complaint of the petitioner, case at crime No.0029 has been registered on 12.01.2022 at Police Station Kannadia. Thereafter, the petitioner made complaint for addition of the offence under Sections 354(A), 354(C) of IPC, 1860 and also Sections 3(2)(va), 3(1)(w)(i), 3(1)(w)(ii), 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(za)(A) of Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. On the said complaint an enquiry was conducted by respondent no.4, who directed SHO, Kanadia Police Station to add the aforesaid offence in the aforesaid case.

Counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the order passed by the respondent no.4 till this date offence have not been added by the respondent no.5. The petitioner has further applied for Police protection before the respondent no.4 apprehending threats and manhandling on the part of the accused persons.

Counsel for the respondent/State submits that the grievance of the petitioner shall be looked into by respondent no.4 in accordance with the law.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties I deem it proper to dispose of the petition with directions to the respondent no.4 to look into the grievance of the petitioner to take necessary action for addition of the offence as directed in the report dated 28.04.2022 and also to consider the application of the petitioner for Police protection in accordance with the law. A prompt action is expected from the respondent no.4.

With the aforesaid directions, writ petition is disposed off.