Tribunals and CommissionsSingle Bench(2025) 10 ITAT CK 2457

Late Sh. Sanjay Bengani Through L/H Sh. Mayank Sagar Bengani vs Income Tax Officer

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi · Decided on 30 October 2025

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satbeer Singh Godara, Judicial Member
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
ITA No. 6197/Del/2025

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 157 words

This assessee’s appeal for Assessment Year 2012-13, arises against the C IT(A)/NFAC, Delhi’s DIN & order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1079433979(1) dated 08.08.2025, in proceed ings u/s 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”).

2.

Heard both the p arties at length. Case file perused.

3.

It emerges at the outset that the appellant has raised a legal ground challenging validity o f the impugned reopening for the precise reason that the asse ssee Sh. Sanjay Bengani had left for his heavenly abode on 13.09.2018 fo llowed by the correspond ing section 148 proceedings initiated against him vide notice dated 19.03.2019 onwards. That being the clinching case, I hereby quote Savita Kapila Vs. AC IT (2020) 118 Taxmann.com 46 (Del.) to conclude that the impugned reopening itself is not sustainable in law. T he same stand quashed in very terms.

4.

This asse ssee’s/his legal representative’s ap peal is allowed.

5.

This assessee’s appeal is allowed.