High CourtsDivision Bench(2010) 10 KL CK 0128

Lalu @ E.L. Yesudas vs P.R. Joseph, Johnson @ Jude. K.E. and The National Insurance Company Ltd.

High Court Of Kerala · Decided on 1 October 2010

HON’BLE JUDGES
P.Q. Barkath Ali, J · A.K. Basheer, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
MACA No. 1694 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 261 words

A.K. Basheer, J.—The prayer in this application filed u/s 5 of the Limitation Act is to condone the delay of 328 days in filing the appeal.

2.

The impugned award was passed by the Tribunal on April 1, 2009. But, according to the petitioner/appellant, he was under the impression that his counsel would have taken steps to apply for a certified copy of the award. However, when he went to the office of the counsel on September 1, 2009 to enquire whether copy of the award had already been obtained or not, it was revealed that no such application had been filed because of the oversight on the part of the clerk of the counsel. Therefore the petitioner requested the counsel to take necessary steps. When the petitioner made further enquiries after two months, his counsel advised him to wait till the release of the entire compensation amount which is deposited in a nationalised bank for three years. Thereafter the petitioner took back the records and entrusted the matter to another counsel.

3.

It is seen from the endorsements on the award that the copy application was filed only on April 7, 2010. The copy is seen to have been obtained on July 7, 2010. But the appeal is filed only on August 19, 2010.

4.

Having carefully perused the entire averments in the affidavit filed in support of the application for condonation of delay, we are not at all satisfied with the so-called explanation offered by the petitioner. Therefore the delay petition is dismissed.

Consequently the appeal is also dismissed.