Supreme CourtDivision Bench(1981) 04 SC CK 0028

Lalit Mohan Mondal and Others vs Benoyendra Nath Chatterjee

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 14 April 1981 · Citation: AIR 1982 SC 785 : (1982) CriLJ 625 : (1982) 3 SCC 219

HON’BLE JUDGES
V. Balakrishna Eradi, J · S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Appeal No. 408 of 1981

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 201 words

S. Murtaza Fazal Ali, J.—We have heard counsel for the parties and have gone through the judgment of the High Court. We agree with the High Court that against an order passed in appeal u/s 341 of the Criminal P.C, the order would not be revisable by the High Court u/s 397(2) of the Criminal P.C. , but there can be no doubt that the Court is entitled to examine the matter u/s 482 of the Criminal P.C. which expressly overrules the bar contained in Section 341 of the Code. In the instant case, the High Court has merely indicated that this is not a fit case for invoking the inherent power without at all applying its mind whether or not in the circumstances, it was a fit case for filing a complaint, particularly when the matter rested merely on oath against oath.

2.

For this reason, therefore, we allow this appeal and remit the case to the High Court to send for the records and satisfy itself whether the order directing complaint to be filed is expedient in the interest of justice, so as to attract its inherent jurisdiction u/s 482 of the Code. Meanwhile, further proceedings will be stayed.