High CourtsSINGLE BENCH(2017) 08 RAJ CK 0050

Lalit Kumar S/o Nanji Ram vs State of Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 29 August 2017

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sandeep Mehta
CASE NUMBER
845 of 2016

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

28 paragraphs · 278 words
1.

By way of this revision, the petitioner (original complainant

before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Revdar) has approached this

Court for challenging the order dated 29.06.2016 passed by the

learned Sessions Judge, Sirohi in Revision No.38/2015 whereby,

the learned revisional court accepted the revision filed by the

respondent No.2 Natwar Lal and set aside the order dated

24.08.2015 passed by the SDM, Revdar under Section 142 Cr.P.C.

2.

Having heard and appreciated the arguments advanced by

the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the

order under challenge, this Court is of the firm opinion that the

Sessions Court acted well beyond the scope of revisional

jurisdiction while entertaining and accepting the revision and

setting aside the order passed by the SDM. The order passed by

the Executive Magistrate was an interlocutory order passed under

Section 142 Cr.P.C. and as such, a revision was not maintainable

against such order. That apart, the learned Executive Magistrate

had given only a direction that the respondent herein will not raise

any construction beyond his patta. Such a direction was perfectly

lawful and could not have been interfered with.

3.

In this background, the instant revision deserves to be and is

hereby allowed. The impugned order dated 29.06.2016 passed by

the learned Sessions Judge, Sirohi in Revision No.38/2015 is

quashed and set aside and the order dated 24.08.2015 passed by

the SDM, Revdar is restored. The learned SDM, Revdar is directed

to expedite the inquiry of the main proceedings under Section 133

Cr.P.C. and conclude the same within a period of six months from

the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4.

Record be returned to the court below.