High CourtsDivision Bench(1912) 07 AHC CK 0029

Lala vs Nahar Singh

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 13 July 1912 · Citation: (1912) ILR (All) 658

HON’BLE JUDGES
Henry Richards, C.J · Banerji, J
RESULT
Dismissed

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 100 words

Richards, C.J., and Banerji, J.—We think that the court was quite justified in finding that the deceased occupancy tenant, Siya Ram, was a Sudra, and could adopt a daughter's son. This being so, the only question which remains is whether or not an adopted son is a lineal descendant within Section 22 of the Tenancy Act, and in our opinion he clearly is. An adopted son is in the eye of the Hindu law just the same as a natural born son. The appeal fails and is dismissed, but without costs, as no one appears on behalf of the respondents.